UK needs a ‘Plan B’ if new nuclear plans fail

UK needs a ‘Plan B’ if new nuclear plans fail

UK Ministers need to stop “crossing their fingers” and urgently develop a “Plan B” to meet climate change targets if new nuclear power stations are not built on time.
UK needs a ‘Plan B’ if new nuclear plans fail

In a new report published today, the Energy and Climate Change Committee said nuclear power could play an important role as a low carbon technology to help the country meet climate targets and create a secure energy future. However, all but one of the existing power stations are due to close by 2023 and new build is crucial but the Committee has warned that failure to do so could make it “much more expensive” to meet our climate targets and have a “lesser impact” on energy security.

Tim Yeo MP, Chair of the Energy and Climate Change Committee said: “If new nuclear power stations are not built on time, our legally-binding climate change targets will be extremely challenging and much more expensive to meet. The Government seems to be crossing its fingers that private companies will deliver a fleet of new nuclear power stations on time and on budget. Ministers need to urgently come up with a contingency plan in case the nuclear industry does not deliver the new power stations we need.”

The industry has currently set out plans to develop up to 16GW of nuclear power in the UK by 2025 but the Committee is concerned if all the projects will be delivered. Mr Yeo says the Government needs to give investors the confidence as unlike gas-fired power stations, nuclear stations are expensive to build but cheap to operate but it should also provide value for money for UK consumers.

He added: “Locking consumers into paying prices for nuclear power that are unacceptably higher than prices paid to renewables or carbon capture and storage projects would be wrong. It is disappointing that there is still so little transparency about the on-going negotiations between the Government and developers of new nuclear power stations. Government needs to provide more clarity about exactly what forms of support new nuclear projects will receive and whether consumers, taxpayers or project developers will have to cough up if construction costs end up being higher than anticipated.”

Read the full article here

Source: Energy News Live


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s